Dorico hide rests5/24/2023 This will cleverly copy the music from the two other staves into a single staff. You select the entire music for the pair of instruments that you want to combine (Flute 1, Flute 2), hith 'Copy' (Cmd+C), then select the first bar in the target staff (Flutes 1&2), then select 'Reduce' from the 'Note Input' tab. So, you'll have Flute 1, Flute 2, Flutes 1&2 Oboe 1, Oboe 2, Oboes 1&2, etc. In your document, you need to add additional staves for each pair of combined instruments. It doesn't create a dynamic condensed score, though. Sibelius suggests a work-around for condensing the scores. The condensed score is automatically updated when you make changes to the individual parts/instruments. If the voices criss-cross for just one or two notes, you can keep them together on the same staff (there's a setting specifying how many notes is max.). If the voices cross for too long (which makes it extremely illegible when on the same staff), Dorico will split the two parts into independent staves, for the duration of the passage where voices criss-cross. It will also insert the necessary disambiguation markings (Solo, or 1., 2., a2, as needed, when there's a single line of notes). Once your condensing settings are chosen, it will dynamically build a conductor's score based on the parts. When you select 'Condensing', it will ask a few questions (which instruments should pair), and will offer standard pairings (same instruments together, like flutes, oboes, clarinets, etc), plus some other common pairings (3rd trombone & tuba). In a proper conductor score, these pairs must be condensed to a single staff (Flutes together, Oboes together, etc).Īt this point, the only software that allows you to automatically and dynamically generate a condensed conductor's score (using standard rules) is Steinberg's Dorico. This is why the default layout for a score will have each instrument on its own staff (1st Flute, 2nd Flute, 1st Oboe, 2nd Oboe, etc). Overwhelming majority of users use software to produce parts for their orchestral works. Hiding empty staves doesn't properly condense the score, though. For some, hide empty staves works globally, some let you select a specific passage where you want to hide staves, and some have a few options (hide empty staves in all systems except the first one, etc). First one, which most software tools can easily do, is hiding empty staves. Also, the Morgan copy is not signed - the appearances of Webern's name are not clearly in his hand- so is not clearly a holograph by definition.There are two separate issues related to the 'condensed score' layout. ![]() ![]() The Morgan Library manuscript seems to be a manuscript copy made for publication in 1922 (and has a copyright on it), whereas the Moldenhauer manuscript, while firmer and cleaner in places (in the 4 pages available online) also seems to have more crossouts like a first-stage holograph would. The Moldenhauer and Morgan manuscripts are definitely not the same (simple example at the beginning: the former fills in the rests in the double bass line, the latter just omits the tacet double bass line (in the first system) entirely. Moldenhauer Archives, US-Wc (first four pages digitized only) Morgan Library (possible publisher's copy, unsigned) Timpani, triangle, bass drum, cymbals, tam-tam, harp, strings Piccolo, 2 flutes, 2 oboes, English horn, 2 clarinets
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |